The squeak of the blue marker is the only sound. That, and the hum of a laptop fan working way too hard. My hand is cramped into a claw, my knuckles white. Forty-seven neon pink sticky notes are stuck to the wall, each a hastily scrawled fragment of a conversation I barely remember. ‘Wants simpler nav,’ one says. ‘Confused by checkout,’ says another. This is the sacred ritual of user research synthesis: turning human experience into actionable data. And it is a complete and utter fiction.
We tell ourselves a story. We believe the magic happens in the live interview, in the moment of connection when the user says, “Oh, wow, I never thought of it that way.” We think our job is to capture that lightning in a bottle. We nod, we type furiously, we try to split our brain between listening with empathy and being a human dictation machine. We fail at both. The notes we take aren’t the user’s voice; they’re our interpretation of that voice, filtered through our own biases, typos, and the desperate need to keep up.
The real, unsexy truth is that the live conversation is the least valuable artifact of the entire research process. It’s a performance. The user is performing for you, and you are performing for them. The real value isn’t created until weeks later, in the silence, when you can treat the conversation not as a memory to be cherished, but as a dataset to be interrogated.
I didn’t always think this way. In fact, I used to argue the exact opposite. I championed the “top 3 takeaways” email, sent 17 minutes after a call ended. I thought it was efficient. I thought I was capturing the essence, the vibe. Then, a few years ago, I led a project for a legal tech platform. We did 27 user interviews. My summaries were beautiful. They were confident. They pointed to a clear redesign of a core workflow. We spent $477,777 building it. And it failed. Completely. Engagement went down by 17%.
It sent me into a spiral. I felt like a fraud. In a moment of pure self-flagellation, I decided to go back and listen to the original audio recordings. All 27 of them. It was excruciating. It was like accidentally liking your ex’s photo from three years ago-a sudden, horrifying confrontation with a past you thought I remembered clearly, only to find the digital record tells a much different, more awkward story. My memory of the interviews was a highlight reel. The audio was the raw, unedited footage.
That’s when the real work began.
Beyond Product Design: Higher Stakes
This isn’t just about product design. I was talking to a man named Emerson J.-P. the other day, a prison education coordinator. He’s trying to build a program that actually reduces recidivism, using online learning tools for inmates preparing for release. The stakes are a little higher than a checkout button. His problem was fascinating.
“
“When I talk to them,” he said, “I hear what I want to hear. I hear hope. I hear they love the interface. But my notes feel… dishonest.”
– Emerson J.-P., Prison Education Coordinator
Emerson’s budget is tiny, just $1,777 for software. He can’t afford to get it wrong. He started recording video diaries with the participants. The problem was, many of the inmates in his facility were native Portuguese speakers from a local community. His stakeholders, the review board for the prison, did not speak Portuguese. He needed to show them clips to justify the program’s existence, but his quick, translated summaries felt thin. He told me the breakthrough came when he stopped trying to be the interpreter. He started using a tool to automatically gerar legenda em video, creating a direct, unimpeachable record of what was being said. He could share the clips, and the board could read the words as they were spoken. More importantly, he could go back and search the text. He could look for patterns of hesitation, words of frustration, ideas for improvement, all in their original language, without the filter of his own hopeful memory.
Emerson stopped trying to summarize feeling. He started analyzing language. He wasn’t looking for a single “aha!” moment anymore. He was looking for the quiet, repeated truths hidden across dozens of hours of footage. He was treating conversation as data.
We pretend to be scientists, but we operate like storytellers. We gather our users around a campfire, and the one with the most dramatic story about a bug wins the attention of the engineering team. The ‘loudest’ customer voice, the most recent complaint, the feature request from the highest-paying client-these become our roadmap. This is not research; it’s anecdote-driven development. It’s the opposite of rigor. And it’s why so many well-intentioned products fail to solve the actual problem.
“
The real work of user research is an act of profound humility. It is the acceptance that you, the researcher, are the biggest source of bias in the entire process. Your brain is a flawed recording device. Your memory is a corrupt file system.
– The Author
The only way to honor the user’s experience is to get yourself out of the way as much as possible.
This means a fundamental shift in where we place value. The value is not in your notes. It’s not in your memory. It’s in the transcript. A searchable, taggable, queryable transcript. An unblemished artifact of a moment in time. When you have that, you can ask questions you never thought to ask during the live call. You can search for every instance of the word “annoying” across 37 interviews. You can see how many times users mention your competitor. You can isolate every sentence where a user expresses a financial concern.
I still hate the administrative part of it. I detest organizing files and checking transcripts for accuracy. It feels like the opposite of the creative, empathetic work I thought I was signing up for. And I do it every single time now. I do it because building something based on a hallucination is infinitely more painful. I do it because the most important insights are never the ones that announce themselves. They are the quiet ones, the whispers you only hear the third time you listen, the patterns that only emerge when you can see the entire forest-every last word of it.
