October 18, 2025

Kevin’s Fishing Trip and the Ghost in Your Machine

Kevin’s Fishing Trip and the Ghost in Your Machine

The hum is the first thing you notice when the panic subsides. Not the loud, frantic hum of the emergency meeting, but the low, monotonous drone from the closet at the end of the hall. It’s been there for 17 years, a piece of office furniture you stopped hearing, like the ticking clock or the elevator bell. But now, with Kevin’s two-weeks-notice email burning a hole in your screen, that hum sounds different. It sounds like a countdown.

The Silent Hum

A piece of furniture you stopped hearing.

That closet holds a beige tower server running a custom billing application Kevin wrote in 1998. It processes every single transaction, every invoice, every client record for M&T Air Conditioning Ltd. It has exactly zero documentation, its interface looks like a tax form from the Cold War, and the only person on Earth who understands its 47,000 lines of arcane code is Kevin. And Kevin has decided, quite reasonably, that he’d rather spend his days wrestling with a largemouth bass than with a legacy database held together by digital duct tape and hope.

The Real Problem: Legacy Thinking

So we panic. We assemble a task force. We call in consultants who use words like “de-risking” and “sunsetting.” The entire conversation orbits the technology. How do we migrate the data? What language should the new system be written in? Can we find another COBOL wizard who hasn’t yet retired to a golf course?

We are asking the wrong questions.

The focus on the outdated server is a masterful act of misdirection. We are staring at the fossil and ignoring the dinosaur that made it. The real problem isn’t the legacy system. It’s the legacy thinking that calcified and became that system.

That beige box isn’t just a computer; it’s an archeological record of every bizarre business decision, every one-off client discount, every lazy exception, and every temporary workaround made over the last two decades. That special billing code for the client who only orders on Tuesdays? It’s in there, hardcoded on line 2,377. The manual override for shipping costs that was only supposed to be used for that one disastrous week in 2007? It’s now the default, and nobody remembers why. The system is a ghost, a perfect, incorruptible memory of a business that no longer exists. Kevin isn’t just the gatekeeper of the code; he’s the high priest of our institutional amnesia.

Layers of Decisions

Unexamined history of workarounds

I confess, this feels uncomfortably familiar. Years ago, I built what was supposed to be a temporary spreadsheet to track project milestones. It had conditional formatting, a few clever formulas, and was meant to last for a single 7-week sprint. That was 7 years ago. Today, it’s known as the “Master Tracker,” and entire departments would grind to a halt without it. I sometimes get emails asking for features, and I have to go back and stare at my own cryptic cell notations, trying to excavate the logic of a person I barely remember being. I created a Kevin.

I became the problem I now criticize.

This is organisational debt, the evil twin of technical debt. It’s the accumulation of compromises and unresolved decisions. It’s the process that makes no sense but “we’ve always done it that way.”

It’s the presence of Cora P. on the payroll. Cora’s job for the last 27 years has been testing mattress firmness. She lies on them, she pokes them, she assigns a proprietary “Cora Score” from 1 to 10. But last year, the company spent a fortune on a German machine that measures mattress density with a laser and provides an objective rating down to 7 decimal points. Cora’s job is obsolete. But nobody wants to have that conversation. Instead, they’ve given her a new title: “Sensory Calibration Specialist.” Her job is to occasionally lie on a mattress to “validate” the multi-million dollar machine’s output. She is a legacy system in human form, a workaround to avoid confronting a necessary, uncomfortable evolution.

🧍♀️

Cora P.

Sensory Calibration Specialist

Subjective “Cora Score”

VS

🔬

German Machine

Measures Density with Laser

Objective 7-Decimal Rating

We are all mattress companies, and we all have our Coras.

The code is not the problem. The code is the scar tissue.

It forms over a wound, a decision made under pressure. It’s ugly, inflexible, and doesn’t work as well as the original skin, but it holds things together. Ripping out Kevin’s server without understanding the wounds it covers is malpractice. You’re not just performing a data migration; you’re performing an autopsy on your own company’s history.

Learning from the Physical World

This is identical to the challenges faced in the physical world. Consider a 47-year-old commercial building. Its tenants complain that the cooling is uneven, and the energy bills are astronomical. The obvious diagnosis is an old, inefficient air conditioning unit on the roof. The temptation is to just swap it out. But the real professionals, the teams that handle complex commercial Surrey HVAC retrofits, know the rooftop unit is just a symptom. When they start digging, they find the building’s fossil record.

1970s

Ducts routed for old offices

1997

Vents covered by hasty renovation

Today

24/7 Data Center needs

They find ducts from the 1970s that are routed to offices that don’t exist anymore. They find vents covered up by a hasty renovation in 1997. They find a central thermostat programmed with a schedule from a 9-to-5 business, even though the building is now home to a 24/7 data center. They aren’t just replacing a machine; they are confronting decades of unexamined assumptions about how the building is used. They are fixing the thinking first, then the technology.

The Gift of Reckoning

So the panic over Kevin’s departure is actually a gift. It’s a forced moment of reckoning.

The goal is to ask, with brutal honesty, what we would build today if we were starting from scratch, with no memory of the “special client discount” or the “Tuesday-only rule.”

It requires a kind of corporate exorcism. You have to gather the stakeholders and walk through every single function of the old system, asking not “how do we replicate this?” but “why does this exist at all?” Most of the answers will be a shrug. “Kevin set it up that way.” “I think it had something to do with the merger in ’07.” Many of those convoluted rules your business runs on aren’t strategic decisions; they are the digital equivalent of a path worn in the grass because it was the shortest route to the smoke pit 17 years ago. The smoke pit is gone, but everyone still takes the long way around.

Forging New Paths

Abandoning the worn ways for clarity

This process is painful. It reveals how much of your daily operation is running on autopilot. It exposes the contradictions and the absurdities. It forces you to admit that nobody has had a complete picture of the business for a very long time. But the alternative is worse. The alternative is finding another Kevin, paying him a king’s ransom, and pushing the problem down the road for another decade. The alternative is sticking with Cora P., pretending her “sensory calibration” is a real job while a perfectly good laser sits idle. The alternative is keeping the humming server in the closet, letting it dictate the rules, a ghost of decisions past holding your future hostage. Kevin’s fishing trip is an opportunity to finally let that ghost go.

Embrace the reckoning. Let the ghost go.